A Federal High Court sitting in Lagos, yesterday, ordered the temporary attachment of funds allegedly belonging to an oil company, Ontario Oil and Gas, over alleged fraudulent sale of refined petroleum.
Justice Hadiza Shagari gave the orders after listening to an ex parte application instituted by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) seeking attachment of the funds.
The commission in affidavit of urgency filed in support of the application and deposed to by one of its investigating officer, Abdukarim Acheneje, stated “That the EFCC received a petition from one Barrister Joan Ganadanu against the second respondent, complaining of fraud, diversion and conversion of proceeds of sale of refined petroleum products valued at N1.96 billion.
“That the petition alleged that the first respondent is a customer to Union Bank plc, of stallion plaza branch, marina Lagos.
“That Union Bank granted a loan facility to the first respondent in the tune of 70 million dollars to import and/or purchase locally refined petroleum products PMS, DPK and AGO.
“That further investigations revealed that the respondent have lifted the product on the order financed by the bank for 10,000 metric tons of AGO, since July 2016.
“That the respondent have sold same, but have refused to lodge the proceeds in the company’s account, and pay back the facility to Union Bank.
“That the respondents have refused to authorize Union Bank to repossess the unloaded order of PMS from the Petroleum Products Marketing Company.
“That the respondent have breached the terms of transactions between them and union bank.
“That investigations reveals that the respondents instead, diverted the funds to the account of Renoir Logistics Ltd, and intelligence further reveals that Ontario oil and Gas has an outstanding 15,000 metric tons of DPK and 5,000 metric tons of PMS.
“That intelligence report gathered shows that the respondents are at the verge of dispensing with the said properties, and that the order of the court is urgently needed to attach the property mentioned in paragraph nine.
“That unless the application is urgently heard and determined, the respondent will tamper with the property sought to be attached,”
In his ruling, justice Shagari held, “Upon reading the affidavit in support of the ex parte originating summons, and after hearing Nkereuwem Anana, counsel for the applicant moved in terms of the application, It is hereby ordered as follows: